Expert judgement or simple rule: what half a century of research says

Trust an experienced decision-maker's intuition or an explicit grid? The question has been compared many times.
The synthesis
William Grove and co-authors (2000, Psychological Assessment) meta-analyse 'mechanical' versus 'clinical' predictions: the former are on average as good or better in most studies.
The extension
Daniel Kahneman, Olivier Sibony and Cass Sunstein (2021, Noise, Little, Brown) show professional judgements on identical cases vary widely across people; the book synthesises heterogeneous work.

The nuance
Rules excel mainly when situations repeat and criteria are measurable; with the unprecedented, judgement remains essential. (our executive and employee training programmes)
The limit of common practice
Hiring or allocation decisions often rest on an overall impression without weighted criteria set in advance.
A practical check in Bern
For upcoming hires, set four separately scored criteria before the interview, then after a year compare scores with observed performance. To go further: explore the Decision-making training in Bern, or browse our executive and employee training programmes in Switzerland.
In pictures: Decision-making in Bern



- decision-making
- Bern
- research
- training bern
