Feedback in Basel: improving one priority without sacrificing another
In Basel's pharmaceutical industry, life sciences, Rhine logistics and international R&D, employees often have to meet several demands simultaneously. The managerial question is therefore not simply “what needs to improve?”, but “how can we ask for that improvement without diverting effort from another obligation?”.
What the literature establishes
James Y. Shah, Ron Friedman and Arie W. Kruglanski (2002, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology) show that commitment to a focal goal can inhibit the mental accessibility of alternative goals. This goal-shielding mechanism helps people stay on course, but means that other goals may not remain equally salient. These experiments do not directly investigate feedback conversations; they illuminate a mechanism relevant to understanding their possible effects.
Progress can also redistribute effort
Maria João Louro, Rik Pieters and Marcel Zeelenberg (2007, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology) investigate the dynamics of pursuing multiple goals. Their findings show that persisting with one goal or switching to another depends in part on the interplay between perceived progress, proximity to the goal and emotions. Information about progress may therefore enter into a trade-off between goals rather than merely change how hard someone works.
The premature conclusion
One might conclude that managers should simply reiterate every priority whenever they give feedback. These studies do not test that rule and cannot establish it as a universal prescription. A more cautious hypothesis is to make the trade-off explicit: what must improve, what can wait and what must not be compromised. (our executive and employee training programmes)
What the evidence cannot promise
These studies do not demonstrate that a comment about deadlines causes quality to decline in a Basel company. Nor do they provide validated wording for reconciling productivity, traceability and international coordination. In practice, monitoring only the goal addressed by feedback cannot reveal whether an improvement represents a genuine gain or a transfer of effort.
A practical check in Bâle
As part of SHR's “L'art du feedback” programme, a Basel team could test each improvement request by pairing it with an explicitly protected requirement: speeding up document review without reducing traceability, for example. Over a pilot period defined in advance, it would track both median review time and the proportion of files returned for incomplete documentation, comparing equivalent work. A shorter review time accompanied by more returns would indicate a trade-off to investigate, not an improvement to celebrate unreservedly. To go further: explore the The Art of Feedback training in Basel in the canton of Basel-Stadt, or browse our executive and employee training programmes in Switzerland.
In pictures: The Art of Feedback in Basel
- the art of feedback
- Basel
- research
- training basel