Prioritisation: does the wording of a request change its rank?
The requests reaching a manager’s desk are not written in neutral language. The managerial question is precise: does the order of priorities withstand a different presentation of the same consequences?
What the literature establishes
Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman (1981, Science) show that decision problems with equivalent consequences can elicit different preferences depending on how they are framed. In their well-known public health problem, presenting outcomes as lives saved or lives lost changes choices between a certain option and a risky one. The experiment concerns hypothetical decisions, not the ranking of workplace tasks.
The reference point behind the request
Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky (1979, Econometrica) propose a model in which outcomes are evaluated as gains or losses relative to a reference point, rather than solely in terms of their final value. Their theory also distinguishes how gains, losses and probabilities are evaluated. Applied to scheduling, it suggests a hypothesis worth testing: presenting a task as preventing a loss could alter the allocation decision compared with presenting it as an expected benefit.
The premature conclusion
It might be tempting to conclude that a request framed as avoiding a loss always takes precedence. These studies do not support that conclusion: the effects depend, among other things, on the structure of the choice and on uncertainty. Nor do they justify reframing every request in terms of risk to secure time. (our executive and employee training programmes)
What the evidence does not tell us about schedules
These articles establish neither the frequency nor the magnitude of framing effects in professional schedules in Berne. In practice, two apparently comparable formulations may also convey different information about a legal obligation, the reversibility of a decision or the severity of harm. A useful check must therefore hold facts, deadlines, estimated workload and uncertainty constant.
A practical check in Berne
Within SHR — Swiss Human Resources’ “Time Management & Prioritisation” programme, an exercise could use fictional requests tailored to federal administration, public health, telecommunications and precision industry in Berne. Prepare two equivalent versions of the same portfolio, one framed as benefits gained and the other as losses avoided, then randomly assign them to two groups that rank the requests and allocate the same time budget. For each request, compare its average rank and allocated share of time, keeping the language and data identical across versions. A difference would indicate sensitivity to framing in this exercise, without proving a lasting bias in actual work. To go further: explore the Time Management & Prioritisation training in Bern, or browse our executive and employee training programmes in Switzerland.
In pictures: Time Management & Prioritisation in Bern
- time management & prioritisation
- Bern
- research
- training bern