Customer reception: clear instructions for whom?
In Sion, guiding a visitor through a hydropower facility, a healthcare establishment, a winery or an Alpine tourism service means translating familiar procedures into usable instructions. The management question is specific: how can we check whether reception instructions enable a non-specialist to know what to do next?
What the literature establishes
Raymond S. Nickerson (1999, Psychological Bulletin) examines how we estimate other people's knowledge, notably by using our own knowledge as a starting point. His review explains why we may overestimate what is shared, even when we try to take the other person's perspective into account. At reception, the risk is treating a department name, an administrative step or a route as obvious when it is familiar only within the organisation.
Expertise can obscure the novice's difficulty
Pamela J. Hinds (1999, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied) experimentally examines how expertise affects estimates of the time novices need to complete a task. For the tasks studied, experts underestimate that time more than less expert participants do, and the corrective methods tested are insufficient to eliminate the bias. The finding concerns performance prediction rather than customer reception directly, but it illuminates a difficulty: knowing a procedure well does not guarantee that we can anticipate its obstacles for others.
The premature conclusion
One might conclude that all technical vocabulary should be removed and every explanation shortened. These studies do not support such a general prescription: some terms are necessary to identify a document, a piece of equipment or a safety rule. The issue is instead to connect accurate information to an identifiable action, without assuming that the customer already understands the organisation's internal reference points. (our executive and employee training programmes)
What these data do not demonstrate
A review of knowledge estimation and experiments on novice performance do not demonstrate that a particular wording improves satisfaction at a reception desk in Sion. Nor do they allow every misunderstanding to be attributed to language: inconsistent signage or a poorly designed procedure can make an accurate explanation unusable. Simply asking “Is that clear?” provides little verifiable evidence of what the person will actually do.
A practical check in Sion
Within the “Accueil client” programme at SHR — Swiss Human Resources, one possible exercise is to select a frequently used wayfinding instruction in a Sion organisation that involves no immediate safety issue. Across comparable time slots, alternate the usual wording with wording that specifies the next action, its location and, where necessary, the required document, then ask with the visitor's consent: “To check my explanation, what will your next step be?” The measure is the proportion of visitors questioned who correctly identify that step without correction, recording the response count and defining success criteria in advance, without personal data. A difference is a local signal requiring confirmation, not universal proof; persistent misunderstandings should also prompt a review of the procedure itself. To go further: explore the Client Reception training in Sion in the canton of Valais, or browse our executive and employee training programmes in Switzerland.
In pictures: Client Reception in Sion
- client reception
- Sion
- research
- training sion