Customer reception: a digital channel is not enough to ensure completion
In financial services, insurance, tech and the European headquarters of international groups in Zurich, a kiosk or portal may be the first point of contact. The managerial question is specific: under what conditions can customers be directed towards that system without leaving them stranded when they encounter a difficulty?
What the literature establishes
Fred D. Davis (1989, MIS Quarterly) shows that perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use are associated with the acceptance of information technology. These are distinct dimensions: a tool can appear simple without seeming useful for the task at hand. For customer reception, this work provides an analytical framework, not evidence that a digital journey will be a better substitute for a member of staff.
When customers must deliver the service themselves
Matthew L. Meuter, Amy L. Ostrom, Robert I. Roundtree and Mary Jo Bitner (2000, Journal of Marketing) analyse satisfying and dissatisfying incidents reported by users of self-service technologies. Positive experiences relate, among other things, to the system's ability to meet a need or make a task easier; negative experiences include technological failures and process problems. Service therefore depends not only on the interface, but on what it actually enables customers to achieve.
The premature conclusion
One might infer that a simpler interface makes it possible to withdraw human assistance. These studies establish neither that equivalence nor the general superiority of a hybrid reception model. Instead, they suggest separating two questions: does the customer accept the tool, and can they complete their task when the intended journey no longer fits? (our executive and employee training programmes)
What the evidence cannot settle
Davis's work does not focus specifically on customer reception, and the study by Meuter and his colleagues draws on reported incidents rather than an experimental comparison of reception systems in Zurich. These findings therefore determine neither the staffing level required nor the right moment to offer help. In practice, counting only completed digital transactions overlooks people who abandon the process or quietly turn to another channel.
A practical check in Zurich
As part of SHR's « Accueil client » programme, a verifiable exercise would be to test clearly signposted human assistance at the start of the digital journey at a Zurich site. Across two comparable weeks, before and during the test, record without personal data the number of tasks started, completed without help, completed with help and abandoned, distinguishing the main types of requests. The central indicator would be the proportion of started tasks that are completed, alongside the staff time spent providing assistance. This comparison alone would not prove causality, but it would help check whether the promised self-sufficiency corresponds to a real ability to complete the task. To go further: explore the Client Reception training in Zurich, or browse our executive and employee training programmes in Switzerland.
In pictures: Client Reception in Zurich
- client reception
- Zurich
- research
- training zurich