Customer reception: trying without feeling committed
In customer-facing sales, offering a trial often seems more useful than extending an explanation. Yet the management question is specific: how can staff enable exploration without suggesting that it already constitutes a commitment?
What the literature establishes
Joann Peck and Suzanne B. Shu (2009, Journal of Consumer Research) show experimentally that merely touching an object can increase perceived ownership. The object's valuation depends both on that feeling and on whether the touch experience is pleasant or unpleasant. An invitation to pick up an item is therefore not necessarily neutral, even before a sale is discussed.
When ownership changes value
Daniel Kahneman, Jack L. Knetsch and Richard H. Thaler (1990, Journal of Political Economy) document an endowment effect: in their experiments, owning a good can lead people to demand more to give it up than buyers are willing to pay to acquire it. This finding concerns goods actually assigned to participants, not a simple invitation to try something. It nevertheless highlights a useful distinction for customer reception: assessing an object as a prospective buyer and considering giving up an object that has become “mine” are not equivalent processes.
The premature conclusion
One might conclude that trials should be multiplied to facilitate sales, or that all handling should be avoided to protect customers. Neither general prescription follows from the cited studies. Touch can provide relevant information about a material or how an item feels in the hand; the management challenge is to preserve the distinction between exploration and decision. (our executive and employee training programmes)
What these findings do not demonstrate
These experiments do not demonstrate that customers who try a product believe they are contractually committed, or that they feel an obligation towards the staff member assisting them. Nor do they justify directly transferring findings about objects to a banking simulation or a service demonstration. Finally, they do not test whether explicitly stating that a trial carries no commitment is effective: that intervention remains a practical hypothesis to investigate.
A practical check in Lugano
Within SHR's “Accueil client” programme, a local exercise could involve explicitly stating, whenever accurate, that exploration does not commit the customer: trying on an item in a fashion shop, examining a sample in a trading business, attending a demonstration at an Italian-speaking family SME or exploring a simulation at a bank. A shared formulation could be: “Può provare senza impegno; deciderà dopo se desidera proseguire.” Before and after introducing it, collect anonymous, voluntary answers to the same question: “Does this trial or simulation commit you to buying or signing?”, then calculate the proportion of “yes” answers among responses received, separately for each type of situation. This comparison would not establish causality on its own, but it would provide a verifiable indicator of understanding rather than simply a conversion rate. To go further: explore the Client Reception training in Lugano, or browse our executive and employee training programmes in Switzerland.
In pictures: Client Reception in Lugano
- client reception
- Lugano
- research
- training lugano