In Sion, is working while ill a sign of reliability?
In the “Psychosocial Risks” programme at SHR — Swiss Human Resources, attendance deserves as much scrutiny as absence. The management question is precise: how can organisations maintain continuity without making an ill person's attendance implicitly compulsory?
What the literature establishes
Gunnar Aronsson, Klas Gustafsson and Margareta Dallner (2000, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health) studied working despite feeling that one's health warranted sick leave. Their Swedish survey identifies differences between occupations, with working while ill more frequent in certain care and education professions. It encourages attention to work organisation rather than interpreting attendance simply as an individual disposition.
The mechanism behind constrained attendance
Gary Johns (2010, Journal of Organizational Behavior) reviews research on presenteeism and distinguishes attendance behaviour from its potential consequences for productivity. His framework considers attendance pressures, attitudes towards work and the occupational context, among other factors. Someone may therefore attend not because they feel fit to work, but because they anticipate the cost of their absence to colleagues or themselves.
The premature conclusion
One might conclude that any attendance while experiencing a health problem is necessarily harmful and should be prevented. This conflates different situations: working with a condition compatible with adjusted duties is not the same as feeling compelled to remain at one's post despite needing sick leave. Management should make alternatives feasible without taking the place of medical assessment. (our executive and employee training programmes)
What conventional indicators do not show
The Swedish survey relies on self-reports and cannot, on its own, establish causality or justify transferring its findings to Sion. The review also highlights variation in definitions and measures of presenteeism. A dashboard limited to days of absence therefore reveals neither why people work while ill nor whether cover is genuinely available.
A practical check in Sion
In Sion, a hydropower maintenance team, a healthcare service, a wine-growing business or an Alpine tourism operator can test the same question: what happens to the work when someone needs to take sick leave? Over four weeks, record every need for cover arising from an unplanned absence, without diagnoses or identities in the log, then check whether cover, postponement or a reduction in activity was explicitly agreed before the affected shift began. The indicator is the proportion of these needs that received an operational response within that time; it measures organisational capacity, not people's health. This check offers a starting point for prevention without claiming to demonstrate reduced presenteeism. To go further: explore the Psychosocial Risks training in Sion in the canton of Valais, or browse our executive and employee training programmes in Switzerland.
In pictures: Psychosocial Risks in Sion
- psychosocial risks
- Sion
- research
- training sion