Can more predictable schedules reduce work–family conflict in Lugano?
A banking close, a fashion delivery or a trading transaction can lead to changes in a schedule that has already been communicated. The management question is specific: could reducing these last-minute changes help prevent psychosocial risks, including in Lugano's Italian-speaking family-owned SMEs?
What the literature establishes
Tammy D. Allen, David E. L. Herst, Carly S. Bruck and Martha Sutton (2000, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology) reviewed research on the consequences of work-to-family conflict, where work obligations interfere with family life. Their review reports associations with outcomes including lower job satisfaction and psychological strain. This makes the conflict a relevant focus for prevention, rather than a difficulty to be attributed immediately to employees' management of their private lives.
The mechanism: time, but also strain
Jeffrey H. Greenhaus and Nicholas J. Beutell (1985, Academy of Management Review) distinguish, in a theoretical article, between inter-role conflicts based on time, strain and expected behaviours. A schedule change can interfere with a family responsibility; strain experienced at work can also make it harder to fulfil a family role, even when someone gets home on time. This distinction explains why counting working hours alone does not adequately describe the problem.
The premature conclusion
It might seem to follow that simply letting everyone choose their hours would solve the problem. Yet nominal flexibility does not necessarily offer predictability if commercial emergencies regularly override agreed arrangements. The cited work provides grounds for examining this hypothesis, but does not demonstrate that a particular scheduling policy will, on its own, reduce harm to health. (our executive and employee training programmes)
The limits of the evidence and informal arrangements
The review draws largely on correlational data, while the second article offers a conceptual framework: neither allows all work–family conflict to be attributed to schedule changes. Family responsibilities, occupations and cover arrangements differ, limiting direct comparisons between teams. In an Italian-speaking family-owned SME, an oral agreement may be helpful, but managers should check that it genuinely allows employees to decline a change without having to justify their private circumstances.
A practical check in Lugano
As part of SHR's “Psychosocial Risks” programme, a team in banking, fashion, trading or a family-owned SME in Lugano could test a rule: any schedule change with less than two days' notice requires explicit acceptance, with alternative cover arranged if it is declined. During a two-week baseline period and then a two-week trial, record the proportion of days worked whose scheduled hours were changed with less than two days' notice, distinguishing employer requests from employee requests. A brief, optional question in Italian can complement this record: “Have schedule changes made it difficult to meet your family commitments this week?”, without collecting private details or publishing identifiable responses. The comparison will document implementation of the rule and any indication of improvement, not establish an effect on health. To go further: explore the Psychosocial Risks training in Lugano in the canton of Ticino, or browse our executive and employee training programmes in Switzerland.
In pictures: Psychosocial Risks in Lugano
- psychosocial risks
- Lugano
- research
- training lugano