Time management: do you have to look busy to gain recognition?
Within a team, visible busyness is readily available information, unlike the value of the work accomplished. The management question is specific: how can recognition reward sound priorities rather than the appearance of being overwhelmed?
What the literature establishes
Silvia Bellezza, Neeru Paharia and Anat Keinan (2017, Journal of Consumer Research) show experimentally that a person described as very busy can be attributed higher status, notably because they appear competent and in demand. This effect depends on cultural context and beliefs about social mobility; it is not a universal preference for overwork. Crucially, these studies concern status judgements, not the actual productivity of the people described.
Time pressure can also change what people notice
John M. Darley and C. Daniel Batson (1973, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology) studied theology students who had to walk to another building, with instructions inducing different levels of hurry. Participants under greater time pressure were less likely to stop and help someone who appeared to be in distress. This experiment illuminates a separate mechanism: time pressure can change responses to a need encountered along the way, without establishing that the prestige associated with busyness itself produces this effect.
The premature conclusion
It would be tempting to conclude that very busy people are trying to display their importance, or inevitably become less attentive to others. Neither study supports this diagnosis of an individual. The useful distinction is between actual workload, the social signal it sends and the behaviours that time pressure may encourage. (our executive and employee training programmes)
What the evidence cannot determine
These studies do not test a system for assessing priorities in a Lausanne organisation, nor do they show that changing the language used would improve performance. Experimental status judgements and a single helping situation reproduce neither the regulatory constraints of a medtech company nor the interdependencies of a higher education institution. In practice, counting hours or visible commitments is therefore insufficient to distinguish useful contribution from mere busyness.
A practical check in Lausanne
As part of SHR — Swiss Human Resources' « Gestion du temps & priorisation » programme, a Lausanne team in medtech, higher education, international sport or a Lake Geneva region scale-up can test a weekly review that separates busyness from contribution. For four weeks, record separately, for each priority reviewed, the reported workload, the expected result and verifiable evidence of progress appropriate to the work. Then measure the proportion of priorities whose retention is justified solely by the workload or effort cited, without reference to the expected result or evidence of progress. This record does not measure productivity: it makes the role of busyness in prioritisation decisions open to scrutiny. To go further: explore the Time Management & Prioritisation training in Lausanne in the canton of Vaud, or browse our executive and employee training programmes in Switzerland.
In pictures: Time Management & Prioritisation in Lausanne
- time management & prioritisation
- Lausanne
- research
- training lausanne