Difficult conversations: does the ending change the memory?
A manager may carefully prepare the announcement of a difficult decision while leaving the final minutes of the conversation to improvisation. Within SHR's Emotional Intelligence programme, a specific question deserves examination: can the way the conversation ends change how the employee remembers it?
What the literature establishes
Daniel Kahneman, Barbara L. Fredrickson, Charles A. Schreiber and Donald A. Redelmeier (1993, Psychological Science) compared experiences involving immersion of a hand in painfully cold water. Participants more often chose to repeat the longer experience when its additional segment was less unpleasant, despite a longer total exposure. This experimental finding shows that retrospective preference does not necessarily correspond to the sum of the discomfort experienced.
Memory is not a continuous recording
Donald A. Redelmeier and Daniel Kahneman (1996, Pain) compared pain ratings collected during medical examinations with retrospective evaluations. Memory was associated particularly with peak pain intensity and pain at the end of the examination, rather than simply with its duration. This observation suggests that certain moments carry particular weight in the overall assessment, without establishing a universal rule for every interaction.
The premature conclusion
One might conclude that ending a difficult conversation on a positive note is enough. These studies demonstrate neither that a final compliment restores trust nor that a pleasant conclusion compensates for an unfair decision. A useful ending must remain consistent with the conversation: acknowledge what remains difficult and clarify what happens next, rather than manufacture a reassuring final impression. (our executive and employee training programmes)
What these data do not tell us about management
These studies concern physical pain, not conversations between managers and employees involving power, fairness and professional consequences. Nor do they assess an emotional intelligence skill or the effectiveness of training. Their value for management lies in generating a testable hypothesis about the memory of a conversation, not in guaranteeing the effect of a closing technique.
A practical check in Genève
In Geneva, a team in private banking, an international organisation, luxury watchmaking or commodity trading could test a structured ending to sensitive conversations: restate the decision, acknowledge the difficulty and make the next step explicit. An exercise within SHR's Emotional Intelligence programme could compare two randomly assigned versions of the same simulation, differing only in their ending. The following day, measure the proportion of participants who correctly recall the decision and next step, and separately collect their assessments of how unpleasant the conversation felt. This check tests a local hypothesis; a better impression must not be mistaken for better understanding or a fairer decision. To go further: explore the Emotional Intelligence training in Geneva in the canton of Geneva, or browse our executive and employee training programmes in Switzerland.
In pictures: Emotional Intelligence in Geneva
- emotional intelligence
- Geneva
- research
- training geneva