Research 2026-06-16 Client Reception Fribourg

Customer reception: improve the ending without obscuring the experience

Customer reception: improve the ending without obscuring the experience — SHR, Fribourg
Customer reception: improve the ending without obscuring the experience — SHR, Fribourg

A reception team can end an exchange courteously while leaving a request unanswered. The management question is specific: does improving the close of an encounter improve the service, or mainly the customer's memory of it?

What the literature establishes

Barbara L. Fredrickson and Daniel Kahneman (1993, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology) studied retrospective evaluations of affective episodes using film clips. In their experiments, duration carried little weight in the overall judgement, while particular moments, notably peak intensity and the ending, contributed more to the evaluation. The memory of an experience is therefore not necessarily a proportionate account of everything that happened.

A less unpleasant ending can change preferences

Daniel Kahneman, Barbara L. Fredrickson, Charles A. Schreiber and Donald A. Redelmeier (1993, Psychological Science) compared episodes in which participants immersed a hand in painfully cold water. The episode extended by a less painful phase was more often chosen for repetition, even though it added discomfort after an identical initial phase. This finding shows that a better ending can change preferences without reducing the total amount of discomfort.

Customer reception: improve the ending without obscuring the experience — SHR, Fribourg — Fribourg
Customer reception: improve the ending without obscuring the experience — SHR, Fribourg — Fribourg

The premature conclusion

One might infer that a warm farewell compensates for poor reception. These experiments do not establish that: they address neither the resolution of a commercial request nor the accuracy of an administrative answer. For SHR's « Accueil client » programme, the useful distinction is between improving the experience itself and improving its retrospective evaluation; these objectives may align, but they are not interchangeable. (our executive and employee training programmes)

What a satisfaction survey cannot settle

The cited studies concern bounded episodes under experimental conditions far removed from an ongoing service relationship. An overall rating collected after an encounter cannot, on its own, distinguish a resolved request from a favourable final impression. It should be considered alongside an outcome indicator, without assuming that any discrepancy between the two is caused by the closing exchange.

A practical check in Fribourg

In Fribourg, an agri-food site receiving visitors, a bilingual industrial reception desk or a university service counter could test a closing exchange combining a brief factual recap with a farewell suited to the language of the conversation. The proposed protocol is to alternate between usual practice and this closing exchange across comparable time slots, without changing the information or the conditions for accessing the service. For each approach, record separately the overall rating and the proportion of requests whose initial objective has been achieved, using a criterion defined before the test and verifiable in the case record. A better rating without improvement in the second indicator would suggest a possible perceptual benefit, not proof of better service delivery. To go further: explore the Client Reception training in Fribourg, or browse our executive and employee training programmes in Switzerland.

In pictures: Client Reception in Fribourg

Client Reception training in Fribourg — in practice
Client Reception training in Fribourg — in practice
Client Reception training in Fribourg — hands-on workshop
Client Reception training in Fribourg — hands-on workshop
Client Reception training in Fribourg — on the ground
Client Reception training in Fribourg — on the ground