Customer reception: do instructions that are hard to read seem harder to follow?
At reception, written instructions often prepare visitors to act: register, follow a hygiene rule or find their appointment. The management question is precise: with the content unchanged, does readability affect perceived difficulty, and how can we check whether it actually helps people act?
What the literature establishes
Hyunjin Song and Norbert Schwarz (2008, Psychological Science) manipulated the typographic readability of instructions and observed differences in anticipated effort and stated motivation to perform the activity described. In their experiments, a presentation that was harder to read could make the activity itself seem more demanding. The finding therefore concerns the judgment prompted by presentation, not an objective change in the task.
When reading becomes a cue to difficulty
Adam L. Alter and Daniel M. Oppenheimer (2009, Personality and Social Psychology Review) review research on processing fluency: the subjective ease with which information is processed. This ease can serve as a cue in judgments that go beyond the readability of the material itself. In reception settings, the mechanism suggests a hypothesis: visitors might attribute to the procedure a difficulty that comes partly from the document.
The premature conclusion
One might conclude that larger type or a less crowded page is all it takes to improve reception. Yet these studies do not demonstrate that instructions that are easier to read are better understood, better remembered or correctly followed in a workplace setting. Making a procedure less intimidating and enabling people to complete it without errors are distinct objectives. (our executive and employee training programmes)
What the evidence cannot settle
The experiments cited are not an evaluation of workplace reception procedures, and the review brings together varied tasks and judgments. Language proficiency, visual needs and the actual complexity of the process may change outcomes in the field. A stated preference for a document is therefore insufficient to establish its operational effectiveness.
A practical check in Fribourg
As part of SHR's « Accueil client » programme, an agri-food site, a bilingual industrial company or a university reception service in Fribourg could test registration instructions with no safety implications, keeping exactly the same wording in two layouts. The versions would alternate across comparable time slots, separately in French and German, without ever withdrawing available human assistance. The main measure would be the proportion of registrations completed correctly at the first attempt without clarification, while also recording requests for help and perceived difficulty. A document rated more pleasant but producing no improvement in task completion would not, on its own, justify concluding that reception had improved. To go further: explore the Client Reception training in Fribourg, or browse our executive and employee training programmes in Switzerland.
In pictures: Client Reception in Fribourg
- client reception
- Fribourg
- research
- training fribourg